Purpose of this blog

Localism is the paradigm that the most efficient and effective way to live lives of human flourishing and to create sustainable and meaningful communities is to practice the five principles of localism: responsibility, reduction, replacement, regeneration, and reconnection.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

Localism and Care for the World: Thoughts on a New Philosophy of Work


A man is rich in proportion to the number of things, which he can afford to let alone.
-       Henry David Thoreau

To create a philosophy of work that is fit for human beings, we need to remind ourselves of three truths:
1.              You don’t have to be rich or have a lot of money in order to live well.
2.              The world is arranged to make it quite easy to acquire everything you need to live well.
3.              If you’re finding life difficult and not enjoyable then you are doing something wrong.

We have forgotten that money and wealth are not goods in themselves. When we seek to acquire and accumulate more and more wealth, we inevitably cause harm to the environment and exploit the least advantaged among us. In the end, we only end up destroying our own ability to experience happiness and to live well. A poor or modest home, filled with love and healthy relationships, is happier than a mansion filled with isolated individuals and broken relationships. Philosophers have long pointed out that the acquisition of our basic needs should be enjoyable and not too time consuming. As Epicurus said in 300 BCE, it is pleasurable to eat, to have sex, to sleep, even to work if we are doing what we love. The basic necessities of life are good, provide enjoyment, and are abundantly provided when moderately consumed. Yet too often we make it difficult for others and ourselves by seeking not just to satisfy our basic needs, but greedy ambition tempts us to pursue lifestyles that are unnecessary, unenjoyable, and destructive to the environment.

We’ve allowed avarice to flood our lives with unnecessary products forcing us to work and bury our lives in menial servitude to unhealthy status symbols of large homes, expensive cars, and shiny toys. But as Thoreau once said: “In short, I am convinced, both by faith and experience, that to maintain one’s self on this earth is not a hardship but a pastime, if we live simply and wisely.” His advice was to simplify our lives. We should use our talents and time making some real contribution to humanity and the world. If it does make us wealthy, we must not be seduced by the siren song of greed and conspicuous consumption, but still live simply and use our surplus wealth to help others make their contribution. Yet this goes against many years of cultural conditioning!

At least since the industrial revolution, we’ve been socialized into believing that being a productive member of society means working long hours making money for someone else in return for a paycheck. The proof we are a person of value to society and our family is that we work hard and are a good provider. We are taught that if we don’t waste time engaged in activities that neither produce nor consume economic resources, then we show our good character and earn a favored status before God. A person’s worth and value is determined by his or her ability to make money. So we’ve come to feel guilty when we aren’t working, and it seems wasteful if we’re just enjoying ourselves outside of economically approved activities.

Further, if we’re to be considered good employees today with modern technology, especially our smart phones, we’re expected to be available 24/7 to our employers. So instead of being an expression of our humanity and a joyful exercise of our talents and skills in service to others in community, work has become difficult, tedious, and demeaning. Technology should have brought us more creative ways to secure our basic needs, while serving others, and without harming the planet. It should have freed up more leisure time for cultivating our relationships and developing ourselves. Instead it has been used to produce artificial needs, bringing greater consumption, less time for building relationships, and more harm to the planet. Instead of creative leisure time, which renews our spirits, technology has turned us into insecure narcissists who need others to like our posts and friend us on social media. Only their acceptance will assure us that we are lovable and as great as we think we are. Or seeing the fabricated happiness of others’ Facebook or Instagram posts, we fear we are missing out and become anxious and depressed.

Technology mixed with greed and anxiety has led us to produce far more stuff than we need to satisfy our human needs. We have an economy of waste and artificial needs, which drives the consumer economy but kills the human spirit. As Hannah Arendt pointed out, the world today will be annihilated in runway consumption and mindless work. Such consumer capitalism and soulless labor destroys the very things they seek to satisfy. We become like leaky pots, never able to be filled but always needing more. Our lives are consumed in wasteful consumption and dreary jobs. We have jobs, but not work. We pursue careers, but not vocations. We have turned our lives into a commodity to be sold to the highest bidder.

We are each responsible for the impact of our work on the world. We must be creative not destructive in our relationship to the world through our work. Work clears a space for ourselves, a clearing in the physical world where we can achieve our basic existential needs for security, respect and meaningful freedom. But not by injuring others, exploiting community or damaging the environment. We must assume responsibility even for the acts that harm the world, but our not our own. As Abraham Joshua Heschel was fond of saying, “All are not guilty but all are responsible.”

Today people and the environment serve the economy. That’s backward! The economy should serve people and the environment. This new philosophy of work can be neither individualistic nor collectivist. Neither held hostage to global capitalism not controlled by planned socialism. It must be grounded on a belief in localism and the principle of simplifying our wants, so that work becomes something that we love to do and not something that we have to do. If we simplify our wants to those needs, which are natural and necessary, and then seek to satisfy those needs locally, we will free ourselves to discover meaningful work. Work can be humanizing and a joyful expression of our talents and our own authentic way of being human. 

Recall the five principles of localism, the five R’s, which will provide the context to simplify our wants and return to a work that is joyful and creative realizing our full human potential. When we live more and consume less, we will experience the joy that is in intrinsic to life itself. The five R’s are:

Responsibility – we should govern our local communities through equal power relationships and peer practices of town hall meetings, citizen councils, rotational stewardship positions, and mentors. We need to return to some sense of real and genuine self-government and public participation.

Reduction – we should reduce our dependence on distant sources, whether governmental or commercial, for the provision of the necessary goods and services we need to live our lives.

Replacement  - we should replace goods and services acquired from remote sources with goods and services produced and provided locally.

Regeneration – we can regenerate the world through the practice of local innovation and creativity in finding new ways, and improving old ways, of meeting our needs.

Reconnecting – This is not a strategy of isolation or secession form either the national or global community, but a return to the only authentic source of political power – the people governing themselves at the local level. Upon the foundation of self-sustaining and self-governing local communities, we can reconnect community-to-community and then to our governments in the exchange of ideas, best practices, and in assisting less fortunate communities.

For more information on the type of communities such a vision suggests and how to manage them see my book, Deconstructing the Supermeme of Leadership, at https://goo.gl/MpBiWl.